Tag Archives: Practical

What makes a wine great?

This is where you can find a lot of great wines.

Another timed practice essay (60 minutes). I love Karen MacNeil’s writing and keep The Wine Bible within arm’s reach. Her opening chapter in this 900+ page book is picking apart what makes a wine great. A refreshing move and the perfect way to set the tone of this book.

I have been schooled to judge a wine’s quality by the typical FA-BLIC-IT standard whereas The Wine Bible goes into more poetic terms and teases apart some aspects that I think need to show up together in order to judge a wine as truly great. In addition to my combination of distinctiveness and terroir below, I also think that any wine that shows non-fruit aromas are inherently also complex. If there any way to show complexity without showing non-fruit flavors?

This was a fun topic to tear apart, though I had trouble naming all of The Wine Bible’s nine attributes of greatness, but I’m pretty such they are all covered by FA-BLIC-IT. Though maybe this opens the discussion comparing the differences of a quality wine and a great wine…

**************************************************

In your opinion, what are the three most important aspects of “wine greatness” and why?

While it is easy and automatic to decide if a wine is to your liking, to really appreciate a great wine, a taster needs to put aside their subjective opinions and judge a wine on its inherent merits. Greatness in a wine can be defined in several ways and generally incorporates finesse, ageability, balance, length, intensity, complexity, integration and typicity. The Wine Bible defines nine attributes of a great wine that are captured in the list above. The most important of these aspects of wine greatness are non-fruit aromas (part of complexity), precision (part of integration) and the combination of a wine being distinct though still reflecting the terroir of an area (typicity).

Complexity of a wine is defined by the number of discrete aromas and flavors a wine can hold, and a great wine will hold many non-fruit flavors as well as fruit flavors. For example, Beaujolais Nouveau typically shows juicy strawberry and banana flavors. Beautiful flavors on their own, but these wines are typically not regarded as complex. Another Gamay wine from the AOC of Morgon would typically show aromas and flavors of red fruits (cherries, strawberries), dark fruits (blackberry) as well as mineral notes and earth notes of forest floor or mushroom. The wine from Morgon AOC is showing more ‘categories’ of aromas and flavors (fruits, minerality and earth) compared to the Beaujolais Nouveau (just fruits), and this complexity, especially via non-fruit descriptors, is one of the most important aspects of wine greatness.

Off vintage? Yea, not when you are a great wine…

Precision separates good wine from great wine. When a wine can show each of its complex aromas and flavors in defined layers, it should be considered a great wine. A vivid example of this kind of greatness can be found in many parts of the world, including California. There are Napa Cabernet Sauvignons that exhibit all of the power and complexity associated with this region, but, usually a little further up price category, other Napa Cabernet Sauvignons have a precision in delivering blackberry fruit as vividly as vanilla oak notes and as distinctively as showing its smoky notes. Both of these examples are of a balanced wine, but in the latter example, there is not a muddling or a general ‘wash’ of flavors but rather each flavor is vividly etched out across your palate. Even in an off-vintage, a wine like 2004 Château Angelus from St-Emilion in Bordeaux is still exhibiting a precision in flavors which confirms its status as a great wine.

The last aspect is a combination of terroir and distinctiveness. The Wine Bible separates distinctiveness and ability to showcase terroir, but truly great wines will show these together. A distinct wine is to say that it does not show sameness, which is a very important trait to consider when judging a wine’s greatness. However, a wine like Château Beaucastel in Châteauneuf du Pâpe shows a distinction for being only Château Beaucastel. By being atypical for what is expected in this area, this wine is certainly distinct, but falls short of great because its style obscures any sense of terroir. Combining distinctiveness and terroir is one of the most critical aspects of great wines.

A delicious white wine made from Cabernet Franc. Distinct? Yes. Shows terroir? No. Could have been from any cool-climate old world appellation.

While there are many attributes of great wines including distinction, balance, complexity, non-fruit flavors, precision, terroir, length, shape, and ability to evoke an emotion, the most important of these are complexity, precision and that combination of distinctives while still showing where the wine is from. Fortunately for wine drinkers, many wines on the market will exhibit some of these attributes (especially balance and length), but the more of these ‘categories’ of greatness a wine can check off, the more the wine can be considered as one of the world’s great wines.

Happy World Malbec Day!

Leave a reply

April 17th, 1853 marks the day that President Domingo Faustino Sarmiento of Argentina officially made it his mission to transform Argentina’s wine industry. Malbec has gone from the replacement for Merlot (early to pronounce, attractively fruit-forward, including a good shellac of vanilla-scented oak, produced on a massive scale and value-priced) to examples that are more focused, more site-specific, and well-crafted to show their terroir.

In honor of this holiday, I pulled a few bottles to refresh my markers. The two Malbecs I tasted were from the homeland of Malbec (Cahors, France) and the homeland in the New World (Mendoza, Argentina).

Malbec markers:
Overall, the wines are deep garnet with a distinctly pink (sometimes neon) rim and staining tears. In both examples, dark fruits lead the way with medium+ body and balanced alcohol (13.0-13.5%), and what stood out to me was the elevated levels of bright acidity that lifted the mid-palate.

Cahors markers:
Cahors is upriver from Bordeaux on the River Lot, and Malbec is a minor blending partner in Bordeaux, but otherwise, this region has nothing to do with them. Cahors has to be a minimum of 70% Malbec (called Cot here), and the rest can be Merlot and/or Tannat. I love that they “soften” Malbec here with Tannat. My example here was 80% Malbec and 20% Merlot.

Compared to the Mendoza example, the character of the dark fruits was pure, and the aromas were all about savory things: leather, bloody, bitter chocolate, and organic earth. It had bright acidity , but the tannins were more dried herbal/edgy/savory. It is definitely a wine for lovers of old world styles and would show best with food (especially something gamey).

Mendoza markers:
This region is too large to make sweeping generalizations about the climate or soils, and this is might be one of the reasons why Malbec has become a consistently successful brand it is today. With so many micro-terroirs to blend from, you can be assured that you will have a clean, varietally correct glass of wine. I have seen more of a focus on these micro-terroirs lately.

Very fruit forward (to let you know that this is from the New World), the dark fruits of plums and blueberries were cooked (almost candied) and framed by chocolate notes, violet florals, and a hint of mint (or alcohol? The label said 13.0%). But compared to Cahors, this was all about generous and attractive fruits. Again, bright acidity lifted the soft dark fruits, and tannins were more ripe/resolved tannins. Very easy to drink.

Laterals: Syrah, Merlot, and Dão
When I miss Malbec, I usually have Syrah or Merlot. I can also throw a red from the Dão in there. My tasting partner threw in Greanche, but the color and the acidity was off.

Malbec Versus Syrah: Similar color, including pink (though more purple on the Syrah) rim and staining tears. Dark fruits on the nose were also similar, but there were a lot of savory elements in the Syrah that I think are unique to it. For instance, the Cahors shows a lot of savory notes (leather/meaty), and Syrah typically shows meaty/smoky notes. But there’s an olive and mint/eucalyptus that I associate strongly with Syrah. Also, while the Syrah was leading with dark plums, there were also red fruits here.

Malbec has some tannins, but Syrah has massive tannins. The chunky tannins on the Syrah carried the fruit through to the finish while the Malbecs were more balanced between the fruits and the texture of the tannins.

In a blind situation, I would consider Syrah for the color, cooked dark fruits, savory elements, and medium+ acidity. But the tannins here are massive, and the aromas include very distinctive Syrah markers like the olive, smoke, and mint. By comparison, the Mendoza Malbec was all about fruits and spice, and the Cahors was all about savory notes and savory tannins.

Malbec Versus Merlot: The color on the Merlot, while deep, was not as inky as the Malbecs and did not have any pink or staining tears. I always get in trouble using color as an absolute funnel though. Merlot has intense dark fruits but a lot of red fruits as well. Like I said above, I don’t typically get a lot of red fruits out of Malbec but more dark plum and blueberry. That said, there was a sweetness to the Merlot fruit that harkens to Malbec, but it was not candied as in the Mendoza example. The elevated amount of tannins was similar to Malbec but had only moderate acidity in this example of Merlot.

I have often mistaken Merlot for Malbec, and I’m updating my funnel to point out that Merlot has dark and red fruits. Really pay attention to the mid-palate. Malbec has a bright acid lift across your tongue while Merlot has a plump coating of fruit across the tongue (with acidity framing that fruit on the sides). Tell me if you agree.

Malbec Versus Dão: This wine shares the deep ruby color of the Malbec, but the rim is also ruby (nothing pink about it). Like the Cahors, there is a strong savory and meaty note dominating the nose of the Dão, but instead of that organic earth, it was more of a stony minerality. (I typically find a lot of granite notes in all wines from Portugal.)

The Dão had the dark fruits that both Malbecs show but none of the chocolate, and I did find red fruits as well for the Dão (more dried strawberries and cherries) where there were not a lot of red fruits in any of the Malbecs. The palate on the Dão was distinctive with pronounced acidity (even higher than the Malbecs) with massive, coarse tannins. Even the Cahors with its more rustic/savory tannins were finer in texture by comparison.

My funnel will now say that there are more red fruits, pronounced acidity, and massive tannins of native Portuguese grapes in the Dão that make it different from the Malbec.

Other laterals I have written down over the years include Tannat and Petit Verdot for the inky color and massive tannins, but I am finding that Malbecs today show more resolved tannins than I had originally thought. I also have Bonarda as a possible lateral for the acidity, but Bonarda doesn’t show the purple tints of Malbec nor the candied fruit (actually, my Bonarda note reads more like Barbera!). These kinds of laterals are going down the rabbit hole… Go for the obvious.

Malbec Rosé:
No need to adjust your screen. That is the correct color. Bright pink, almost cotton candy in color (White Zinfandel is a lateral on color alone). This makes sense when you remember that the two Malbecs above both had a neon pink meniscus. The rosé here had generous dark fruits, especially blueberry, and a touch of earth (though not mineral). Tried as I did, I did not get any red fruits at all. That’s a marker. Similar medium+ amount of juicy acidity found in the still red versions with a bit of dissolved CO2 to help lift the fruits. It was full-bodied for a rose and not quite bone dry. The tech sheet said 13% abv, and the bottle was printed at 14.5% (I thought it was something in between).

So, those are my markers and laterals. I hope you found it useful. Crack a bottle (or several) of Malbec tonight, and tell me what your markers and laterals are.